Difference between revisions of "Performances"
From CFD Benchmark
Abdelsamie (Talk | contribs) (Created page with "The results presented above were obtained on different architectures, preventing the direct comparison of the performance of the codes. However, the TauBench pseudo-benchmark~...") |
Abdelsamie (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Finally, the performance analysis for the 3-D TGV cases is discussed in the last subsection. | Finally, the performance analysis for the 3-D TGV cases is discussed in the last subsection. | ||
| − | + | = Presentation of the machines used for the benchmark = | |
| − | + | == [[Irene Joliot-Curie from TGCC]] == | |
Revision as of 20:05, 26 September 2020
The results presented above were obtained on different architectures, preventing the direct comparison of the performance of the codes. However, the TauBench pseudo-benchmark~\cite{TauBench,TauBench2} made it possible to assess in a separate test the raw performance of each machine. The following sections will describe the configuration of the three high performance computing (HPC) systems that were used to run YALES2, DINO and Nek5000 for the TGV benchmarks. Subsequently, the TauBench methodology and its results on the target computers will be presented. Finally, the performance analysis for the 3-D TGV cases is discussed in the last subsection.
